Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Foster v. Mahon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Benjamin Franklin Foster III v. various officials from the Dillwyn Correctional Center. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Foster's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Foster v. Mahon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Benjamin Franklin Foster III v. various officials from the Dillwyn Correctional Center. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Foster's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6861

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Benjamin Franklin Foster III v. various officials from the Dillwyn Correctional Center. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Foster's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Foster v. Mahon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Benjamin Franklin Foster III v. various officials from the Dillwyn Correctional Center. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Foster's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6861

    BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FOSTER, III,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    D. T. MAHON, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional
    Center; THOMAS NEUMAYER, Assistant Warden of
    Operations, Dillwyn Correctional Center; NURSE
    SMITH; DOCTOR ALVIG; NURSE LANHAM; LARRY
    HUFFMAN; R. G. PICARELLA, Psychiatrist,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-96-759-R)
    Submitted:

    November 20, 1997

    Decided:

    December 10, 1997

    Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Benjamin Franklin Foster, III, Appellant Pro Se.
    Pamela Anne
    Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Peter
    Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foster
    v. Mahon, No. CA-96-759-R (W.D. Va. May 30, 1997). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like