Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Theodore Justice v. Timothy Farley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Theodore Justice appealed a district court decision dismissing his complaint against various school officials and attorneys. The complaint alleged violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1985(2), and the U.S. Constitution related to his son's education. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The Fourth Circuit also granted Justice leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Theodore Justice v. Timothy Farley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views3 pages
    Theodore Justice appealed a district court decision dismissing his complaint against various school officials and attorneys. The complaint alleged violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1985(2), and the U.S. Constitution related to his son's education. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The Fourth Circuit also granted Justice leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Theodore Justice appealed a district court decision dismissing his complaint against various school officials and attorneys. The complaint alleged violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1985(2), and the U.S. Constitution related to his son's education. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The Fourth Circuit also granted Justice leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views3 pages

    Theodore Justice v. Timothy Farley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Theodore Justice appealed a district court decision dismissing his complaint against various school officials and attorneys. The complaint alleged violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1985(2), and the U.S. Constitution related to his son's education. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The Fourth Circuit also granted Justice leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1077

    THEODORE JUSTICE, for Son,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    DR. TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County School Superintendent;
    MARY WATSON, Director Exceptional Children; AUGUSTUS B.
    ELKINS, Administrative Law Judge; HONORABLE JULIAN MANN,
    III, Administrative Law Judge; AMY MILLER, Program Director
    Exceptional Children; MICHAEL ALLEN, Director Exceptional
    Children;
    KATHY
    TWISDALE,
    Principal
    Stovall
    Shaw
    Elementary; ROBYNN WILLIAMS, Special Education Teacher;
    JAMES E. CROSS, JR., Attorney Granville County Schools;
    DALE W. HENSLEY, Attorney Granville County Schools; KATE
    NEALE, Consultant for Dispute Resolution Department of
    Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division; JULIE
    RICHARDS, Clerk of Court,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00343-D)

    Submitted:

    April 24, 2014

    Decided:

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    April 29, 2014

    Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se. John Graham Corriher,


    Kenneth Alexander Soo, THARRINGTON SMITH LLP, Raleigh, North
    Carolina; Laura Ellen Crumpler, Susannah Porter Holloway, NORTH
    CAROLINA
    DEPARTMENT
    OF
    JUSTICE,
    Raleigh,
    North
    Carolina;
    Tiffany Y. Lucas, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH
    CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Theodore

    Justice

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his complaint raising claims under the Individuals


    with

    Disabilities

    Education

    Act,

    Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C.

    Section

    504

    of

    the

    1983, 1985(2) (2012) and the

    United States Constitution.

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    in

    forma

    pauperis.

    We

    affirm

    for

    the

    Justice v. Farley, No.

    5:13-cv-00343-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014).


    proceed

    we

    dispense

    We grant leave to
    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like