Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony McCoy v. Chappell, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Anthony J. McCoy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officers at Nottoway Correctional Center. The district court denied relief on McCoy's complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6379

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anthony J. McCoy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officers at Nottoway Correctional Center. The district court denied relief on McCoy's complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Anthony McCoy v. Chappell, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anthony J. McCoy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officers at Nottoway Correctional Center. The district court denied relief on McCoy's complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6379

    ANTHONY J. MCCOY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHAPPELL, Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center; ANDERSON,
    Sgt., Nottoway Correctional Center; HURST, Capt., Nottoway
    Correctional
    Center;
    WALTON,
    Lieutenant,
    Nottoway
    Correctional
    Center;
    STOKES,
    Lieutenant,
    Nottoway
    Correctional Center,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:10-cv-00756-JRS)

    Submitted:

    June 14, 2012

    Decided: June 19, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony J. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs, OFFICE OF


    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony J. McCoy appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    McCoy v. Chappell, No. 3:10-cv-00756-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb.

    10, 2012).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like