Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Tony Cobbs, Sr. v. Bottling Group, LLC, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr. appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Bottling Group, LLC in an employment discrimination case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Tony Cobbs, Sr. v. Bottling Group, LLC, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr. appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Bottling Group, LLC in an employment discrimination case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-1093

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr. appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Bottling Group, LLC in an employment discrimination case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Tony Cobbs, Sr. v. Bottling Group, LLC, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr. appealed a district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Bottling Group, LLC in an employment discrimination case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-1093

    TONY RAY COBBS, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BOTTLING GROUP, LLC, a/k/a Pepsi Bottling Group,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (4:11-cv-00011-JLK-RSB)

    Submitted:

    June 14, 2012

    Decided: June 19, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, JACKSON
    LEWIS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tony

    Ray

    Cobbs,

    Sr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order granting summary judgment for Bottling Group, LLC, in his


    employment discrimination action.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Cobbs v. Bottling Group,

    LLC, No. 4:11-cv-00011-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2011).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like