Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Holloway v. Bethea, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Earl Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants related to his incarceration at Evans Correctional Institution. The district court denied Holloway relief and adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that Holloway's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, deciding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7590

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Earl Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants related to his incarceration at Evans Correctional Institution. The district court denied Holloway relief and adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that Holloway's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, deciding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Holloway v. Bethea, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Earl Holloway filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants related to his incarceration at Evans Correctional Institution. The district court denied Holloway relief and adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that Holloway's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, deciding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7590

    EARL HOLLOWAY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TIM BETHEA, of "Outside Detail" at Evans Correctional Institution; GARVIN GAIEL, Doctor at
    Evans Correctional Institution,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-96-1906-3-22BC)
    Submitted:

    January 9, 1997

    Decided:

    January 24, 1997

    Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Earl Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Earl Holloway appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holloway v.
    Bethea, No. CA-96-1906-3-22BC (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like