Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Reliford v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ephrain Reliford Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and denied Reliford's motion for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Reliford v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Ephrain Reliford Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and denied Reliford's motion for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7051

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ephrain Reliford Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and denied Reliford's motion for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Reliford v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ephrain Reliford Jr. filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and denied Reliford's motion for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7051

    EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLES M. CONDON,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-98-142-3-17BC)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 1998

    Decided:

    October 21, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ephrain Reliford, Jr., seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.
    2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Reliford v. Moore, No. CA-98-142-3-17BC (D.S.C. June 5 &
    July 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like