Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crenshaw, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Guy Crenshaw appealed the denial of his motion to modify his sentence. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments. The panel found no errors in the district court's decision to deny Crenshaw's motion based on the reasoning provided in that court's opinion. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit means it does not serve as legal precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7653

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Guy Crenshaw appealed the denial of his motion to modify his sentence. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments. The panel found no errors in the district court's decision to deny Crenshaw's motion based on the reasoning provided in that court's opinion. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit means it does not serve as legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Crenshaw, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Guy Crenshaw appealed the denial of his motion to modify his sentence. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments. The panel found no errors in the district court's decision to deny Crenshaw's motion based on the reasoning provided in that court's opinion. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit means it does not serve as legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7653

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GUY CARMICHAEL CRENSHAW,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-47)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2001

    Decided:

    May 3, 2001

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Guy Carmichael Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Guy Carmichael Crenshaw appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18
    U.S.C. 3582 (1994).

    Our review of the record and the district

    courts opinion discloses no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    United States v.

    Crenshaw, No. CR-96-47 (W.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2000).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like