Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: William Eckles, Jr. V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The petitioner, William Larnell Eckles Jr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) motion. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the current record and denied the petition. As the facts and legal issues were clear, the court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1092

    Original Title

    In Re: William Eckles, Jr. v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner, William Larnell Eckles Jr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) motion. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the current record and denied the petition. As the facts and legal issues were clear, the court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    In Re: William Eckles, Jr. V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The petitioner, William Larnell Eckles Jr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) motion. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the current record and denied the petition. As the facts and legal issues were clear, the court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1092

    In re:

    WILLIAM LARNELL ECKLES, JR.,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4)

    Submitted:

    April 24, 2014

    Decided:

    April 29, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Larnell Eckles, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William Larnell Eckles, Jr., petitions for a writ of
    mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in
    ruling on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.

    He seeks an

    order from this court directing the district court to act.

    We

    find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the
    district court.

    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis and deny the mandamus petition.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like