Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Potts v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charlotte Potts appealed the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits by the Social Security Commissioner. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to affirm the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Potts. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Potts v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Charlotte Potts appealed the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits by the Social Security Commissioner. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to affirm the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Potts. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1647

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charlotte Potts appealed the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits by the Social Security Commissioner. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to affirm the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Potts. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Potts v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charlotte Potts appealed the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits by the Social Security Commissioner. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to affirm the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Potts. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1647

    CHARLOTTE D. POTTS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KENNETH S.
    SECURITY,

    APFEL,

    COMMISSIONER

    OF

    SOCIAL
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-00-865)

    Submitted:

    August 15, 2002

    Decided:

    August 19, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charlotte D. Potts, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Kathleen Carole
    Buckner, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charlotte D. Potts appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner in her action seeking
    judicial

    review

    of

    the

    Commissioners

    decision

    application for disability insurance benefits.


    the

    record

    and

    the

    district

    courts

    to

    deny

    her

    We have reviewed

    order

    accepting

    the

    recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Potts v. Apfel, No. CA-00-865 (E.D. Va. Apr. 15, 2002).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like