Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Joseph Scott Ezell, Jr. v. Halifax County Courthouse, Halifax County Jail U.S. Post Office, U.S. District Court, 810 F.2d 194, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a pro se appeal from a district court order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues already decided in prior cases. It affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Joseph Scott Ezell, Jr. v. Halifax County Courthouse, Halifax County Jail U.S. Post Office, U.S. District Court, 810 F.2d 194, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a pro se appeal from a district court order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues already decided in prior cases. It affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-01-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 810 F.2d 194 Docket: 86-7677

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a pro se appeal from a district court order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues already decided in prior cases. It affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views1 page

    Joseph Scott Ezell, Jr. v. Halifax County Courthouse, Halifax County Jail U.S. Post Office, U.S. District Court, 810 F.2d 194, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a pro se appeal from a district court order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues already decided in prior cases. It affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    810 F.

    2d 194

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Joseph Scott EZELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    HALIFAX COUNTY COURTHOUSE, Halifax County Jail;
    U.S. Post
    Office, U.S. District Court, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-7677.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 25, 1986.
    Decided Jan. 16, 1987.

    Joseph Scott Ezell, Jr., appellant pro se.


    Before PHILLIPS, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 is without merit. Because
    the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense
    with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the
    district court. Ezell v. Halifax County Courthouse, C/A No. 86-905-CRT
    (E.D.N.C., Sept. 8, 1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like