Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    United States v. Enoc Alcantara-Mendez, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders committing Enoc Alcantara-Mendez to the custody of the Attorney General under federal law and denying his motions for reconsideration. The appellate court found that the district court did not err in determining that Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment due to mental illness, and that reconsideration was unwarranted. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Enoc Alcantara-Mendez, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders committing Enoc Alcantara-Mendez to the custody of the Attorney General under federal law and denying his motions for reconsideration. The appellate court found that the district court did not err in determining that Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment due to mental illness, and that reconsideration was unwarranted. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6923

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders committing Enoc Alcantara-Mendez to the custody of the Attorney General under federal law and denying his motions for reconsideration. The appellate court found that the district court did not err in determining that Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment due to mental illness, and that reconsideration was unwarranted. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Enoc Alcantara-Mendez, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders committing Enoc Alcantara-Mendez to the custody of the Attorney General under federal law and denying his motions for reconsideration. The appellate court found that the district court did not err in determining that Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment due to mental illness, and that reconsideration was unwarranted. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6923

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Petitioner Appellee,
    v.
    ENOC ALCANTARA-MENDEZ,
    Respondent - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (5:11-hc-02178-BR)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 2012

    Decided:

    October 22, 2012

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Enoc Alcantara-Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.


    David T.
    BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Huband,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Enoc

    Alcantara-Mendez

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders committing him to the custody of the Attorney General


    under

    18

    U.S.C.

    reconsideration.
    that

    the

    4246

    (2006)

    and

    denying

    his

    motions

    for

    Our review of the record leads us to conclude

    district

    court

    did

    not

    err

    in

    finding

    that

    Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment and did not err
    in denying his motions for reconsideration.
    affirm

    the

    district

    courts

    orders.

    We

    Accordingly, we

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like