Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tucker, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    William David Tucker appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Tucker's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion dated April 5, 2000. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and dispensed with holding a hearing.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6755

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William David Tucker appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Tucker's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion dated April 5, 2000. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and dispensed with holding a hearing.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Tucker, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William David Tucker appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Tucker's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion dated April 5, 2000. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and dispensed with holding a hearing.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6755

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff- Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIAM DAVID TUCKER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CR-97-110, CA-99-395-7)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2000

    Decided:

    August 7, 2000

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    William David Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William David Tucker seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

    cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Tucker, Nos. CR-97-110;

    CA-99-395-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument


    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like