Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Martin v. Patrick Industries, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Patrick Industries in a case brought by Paul J. Martin against the company. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its previous opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-02-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1324

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Patrick Industries in a case brought by Paul J. Martin against the company. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its previous opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    18 views2 pages

    Martin v. Patrick Industries, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Patrick Industries in a case brought by Paul J. Martin against the company. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As such, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its previous opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1324

    PAUL J. MARTIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior
    District Judge. (1:05-cv-00731-WLO)

    Submitted:

    February 6, 2008

    Decided:

    February 21, 2008

    Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robyn B. Bennitt, BENNITT LEGAL SERVICES, Birmingham, Alabama, for


    Appellant. Sheri L. Roberson, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE,
    PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul

    J.

    Martin

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Patrick Industries,


    Incorporated.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court. Martin v. Patrick Indus., Inc., No. 1:05-cv-00731WLO (M.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like