Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Harris v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Randall Brice Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented such that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6986

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randall Brice Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented such that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Harris v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randall Brice Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented such that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-6986

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RANDALL BRICE HARRIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-94-12-P)
    Submitted:

    June 19, 1997

    Decided:

    June 26, 1997

    Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Randall Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for modification of his term of imprisonment. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Harris, No. CR-94-12-P (W.D.N.C. May 30,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like