Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stuart Tompkins v. Joel Herron, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Stuart Wayne Tompkins in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various prison officials and denial of his motions for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Tompkins' motion for appointment of counsel was also denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7210

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Stuart Wayne Tompkins in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various prison officials and denial of his motions for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Tompkins' motion for appointment of counsel was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views3 pages

    Stuart Tompkins v. Joel Herron, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Stuart Wayne Tompkins in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various prison officials and denial of his motions for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Tompkins' motion for appointment of counsel was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7210

    STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOEL
    HERRON,
    Correctional
    Administrator;
    KRISTIE
    B.
    STANBACK, Assist. Superintendent; GERALDUNE O. LEWIS; JOHN
    DOE LOWERY, Sergant Over Mailroom; JOHN DOE INGRAM, Mailroom
    Staff; JANE DOE NORTON, Mailroom Staff; JANE DOE NORRIS,
    Mailroom Staff; ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prison; ALVIN
    WILLIAM KELLER, JR., Secretary of Correction; BEVERLY EAVES
    PERDUE, Governors; JAMES C. FRYE, Program Manager; JOHN DOE
    COVINGTON, Unit Manager; JANE DOE ALFORD, Assistant Unit
    Manager;
    MARRIETTA
    BARR,
    Ex-Assistant
    Manager
    (Now
    Lieutenant); CHANDRA K. RANSOM, a/k/a Jane Doe, Ex-Unit
    Manager,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
    District Judge. (1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2012

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: November 27, 2012

    and

    SHEDD

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    and

    FLOYD,

    Circuit

    Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    Raleigh,
    Appellees.

    Peter Andrew Regulski,


    North
    Carolina,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stuart

    Wayne

    Tompkins

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    denying

    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    denying his motions for reconsideration.


    record and find no reversible error.

    complaint

    and

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Tompkins v. Herron,

    No 1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, & July 11, 2012).


    Tompkins
    dispense

    motion
    with

    for

    oral

    appointment
    argument

    of

    counsel

    because

    the

    is

    denied.

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like