Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Wilson v. Zolicoffer, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Melvin Cornelious Wilson v. B. Zolicoffer et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Wilson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying Wilson's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wilson v. Zolicoffer, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Melvin Cornelious Wilson v. B. Zolicoffer et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Wilson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying Wilson's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6782

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Melvin Cornelious Wilson v. B. Zolicoffer et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Wilson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying Wilson's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Wilson v. Zolicoffer, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Melvin Cornelious Wilson v. B. Zolicoffer et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Wilson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's reasoning for denying Wilson's complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6782

    MELVIN CORNELIOUS WILSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    B.
    ZOLICOFFER,
    Lieutenant;
    E.
    MORRIS,
    Sergeant; E. CLARK, Assistant Warden; W. H.
    TUCKER, Captain; E. MOHEAD, Sergeant; J. V.
    BEALE, Deputy Warden; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional
    Director; J. M. JABE, Chief Warden; RONALD J.
    ANGELONE, Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-96-549-2)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 23, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Melvin Cornelious Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
    William W. Muse,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson
    v. Zolicoffer, No. CA-96-549-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 1997). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like