Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Selby, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Richard Selby appealed the denial of his motion to modify the restitution requirement of his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that the district court provided. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-11-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6883

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Selby appealed the denial of his motion to modify the restitution requirement of his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that the district court provided. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Selby, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Selby appealed the denial of his motion to modify the restitution requirement of his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that the district court provided. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6883

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD SCOTT SELBY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-94-16)

    Submitted:

    October 26, 2000

    Decided:

    November 2, 2000

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Richard Scott Selby, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard Scott Selby appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion for modification of the restitution requirement of his
    sentence.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.


    the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on
    See United States v. Selby,

    No. CR-94-16 (W.D. Va. June 16, 2000).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like