Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gresham, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Teeran Tyron Gresham's "Motion to Recall" a June 2, 2009 order. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Gresham's motion for the reasons stated in that court's June 30, 2010 ruling. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6992

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Teeran Tyron Gresham's "Motion to Recall" a June 2, 2009 order. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Gresham's motion for the reasons stated in that court's June 30, 2010 ruling. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Gresham, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Teeran Tyron Gresham's "Motion to Recall" a June 2, 2009 order. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Gresham's motion for the reasons stated in that court's June 30, 2010 ruling. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6992

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TEERAN TYRON GRESHAM,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (7:03-cr-00064-F-1)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2010

    Decided:

    October 22, 2010

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Teeran Tyron Gresham, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Teeran

    Tyron

    Gresham

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his Motion to Recall the courts June 2, 2009


    order.

    We

    have

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    (E.D.N.C.

    June

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    United States v. Gresham, No. 7:03-cr-00064-F-1


    30,

    2010).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like