Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bey v. Heifner, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views3 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Sakima Iban Salih El Bey filed a §1983 complaint against various police officers and government entities. The district court denied relief to El Bey. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1968

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Sakima Iban Salih El Bey filed a §1983 complaint against various police officers and government entities. The district court denied relief to El Bey. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views3 pages

    Bey v. Heifner, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Sakima Iban Salih El Bey filed a §1983 complaint against various police officers and government entities. The district court denied relief to El Bey. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1968

    SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY, Great Seal National


    State of Moorish Affairs Moorish Republic
    Federal Government,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HEIFNER, Officer; CHIPMAN, Officer; CHARLOTTEMECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; NORTH CAROLINA
    DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; NORTH CAROLINA
    STATE; DIGGS, Magistrate; CAYER, Magistrate;
    PETER GILCHRIST, District Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-459-2-MU-3)

    Submitted:

    May 12, 2004

    Decided:

    June 2, 2004

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, Appellant Pro Se.


    Mark H. Newbold,
    Deputy City Attorney, John Dennis Joye, Assistant City Attorney,
    Charlotte, North Carolina; Karen Anne Blum, Assistant Attorney
    General, William McBlief, Claude Norman Young, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Sakima Iban Salih El Bey appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Bey v. Heifner, No. CA-02-459-2-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like