Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Daggy v. Staunton City Schools, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss Mary Margaret Daggy's civil suit. Daggy had alleged that the defendants conspired to violate her due process rights and discriminated against her based on her age when her job was eliminated. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its unpublished memorandum opinion that dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Daggy v. Staunton City Schools, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss Mary Margaret Daggy's civil suit. Daggy had alleged that the defendants conspired to violate her due process rights and discriminated against her based on her age when her job was eliminated. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its unpublished memorandum opinion that dismissed the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-12-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1282

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss Mary Margaret Daggy's civil suit. Daggy had alleged that the defendants conspired to violate her due process rights and discriminated against her based on her age when her job was eliminated. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its unpublished memorandum opinion that dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    18 views3 pages

    Daggy v. Staunton City Schools, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss Mary Margaret Daggy's civil suit. Daggy had alleged that the defendants conspired to violate her due process rights and discriminated against her based on her age when her job was eliminated. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning as explained in its unpublished memorandum opinion that dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1282

    MARY MARGARET DAGGY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STAUNTON CITY SCHOOLS, in its corporate
    status; SHELLEY P. BRYANT; CHAIR GREGORY C.
    COOK; DR. JAMES J. HARRINGTON; OPHIE A. KIER;
    VICE
    CHAIR
    ANDREA
    W. OAKES;
    ANGIE
    V.
    WHITESELL; TERI SUMEY, in her official and
    individual capacities; NANCY HAYNES, in her
    official and individual capacities; HARRY
    LUNSFORD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (CA-04-23-5)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2005

    Decided:

    December 28, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert P. Dwoskin, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant.


    Elizabeth S. Skilling, Jeremy D. Capps, Joseph Robinson, HARMAN,
    CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Mary Margaret Daggy appeals the district courts order
    granting the defendants motion to dismiss her civil action in
    which she alleged that the defendants conspired to violate her
    rights to procedural and substantive due process and discriminated
    against her on account of her age when her job was eliminated.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    memorandum opinion.

    stated

    by

    the

    district

    court

    in

    We
    its

    See Daggy v. Staunton City Schs., No. CA-04-

    23-5 (W.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like