Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    875 F.2d 316 Unpublished Disposition: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Donald Lee Presley appealed three district court orders denying relief. The appeals court reviewed the records and found the appeals to be without merit. The appeals in cases 88-6812 and 88-7814 were dismissed based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeal in case 88-7347 was affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the appeals court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    875 F.2d 316 Unpublished Disposition: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Donald Lee Presley appealed three district court orders denying relief. The appeals court reviewed the records and found the appeals to be without merit. The appeals in cases 88-6812 and 88-7814 were dismissed based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeal in case 88-7347 was affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the appeals court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-05-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 875 F.2d 316 Docket: 88-6812

    Original Title

    Donald Lee Presley v. Attorney General of Virginia, D.A. Garraghty, Warden, Donald Lee Presley, and Johnnie Henley, Benjamin F. Kearney, Stanley E. Mason, George Houser, Jr., Dennis Ray Lester, George Joyner v. Edward W. Murray, Personally and in His Official Capacity, R.F. Wilson, Personally and in His Official Capacity, Donald Lee Presley v. D.A. Garraghty, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents, 875 F.2d 316, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Donald Lee Presley appealed three district court orders denying relief. The appeals court reviewed the records and found the appeals to be without merit. The appeals in cases 88-6812 and 88-7814 were dismissed based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeal in case 88-7347 was affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the appeals court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    875 F.2d 316 Unpublished Disposition: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Donald Lee Presley appealed three district court orders denying relief. The appeals court reviewed the records and found the appeals to be without merit. The appeals in cases 88-6812 and 88-7814 were dismissed based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeal in case 88-7347 was affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court. Oral arguments were dispensed with because the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the appeals court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    875 F.

    2d 316
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Donald Lee PRESLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, D.A. Garraghty,
    Warden,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    Donald Lee PRESLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    and
    Johnnie Henley, Benjamin F. Kearney, Stanley E. Mason,
    George Houser, Jr., Dennis Ray Lester, George
    Joyner, Plaintiffs,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, personally and in his official capacity,
    R.F. Wilson, personally and in his official
    capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    Donald Lee PRESLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    D.A. GARRAGHTY, Attorney General of the State of Virginia,
    Respondents- Appellees.
    No. 88-6812.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 31, 1989.
    Decided May 9, 1989.

    Donald Lee Presley, appellant pro se.


    Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Office of the

    Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.


    Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Donald Lee Presley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and seeks to appeal two orders of the district court refusing
    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the records
    and the district court's opinions in these cases discloses that these appeals are
    without merit. Accordingly, we deny certificates of probable cause to appeal
    and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court in No. 88-6812
    and No. 88-7814. Presley v. Garraghty, C/A No. 88-86-R; C/A No. 87-129
    (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 1988; W.D.Va. Nov. 9, 1988). We affirm on the reasoning of
    the district court in No. 88-7347. Presley v. Murray, C/A No. 88-440-R
    (E.D.Va. Dec. 2, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    No. 88-6812 DISMISSED.

    No. 88-7814 DISMISSED.

    No. 88-7347 AFFIRMED.

    You might also like