Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Meeks, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Eddie Dean Meeks appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied Meeks' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in denying the § 2255 motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-02-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7057

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Eddie Dean Meeks appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied Meeks' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in denying the § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Meeks, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Eddie Dean Meeks appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It therefore denied Meeks' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning in denying the § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7057

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDDIE DEAN MEEKS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-96-68, CA-98-466-7)

    Submitted:

    February 10, 2000

    Decided:

    February 15, 2000

    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Eddie Dean Meeks, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eddie Dean Meeks seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court. See United States v. Meeks, Nos. CR-96-68; CA98-466-7 (W.D. Va. July 15, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like