Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. McClain, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Anthony McClain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying McClain's § 2255 motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-02-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7359

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Anthony McClain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying McClain's § 2255 motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    United States v. McClain, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Anthony McClain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying McClain's § 2255 motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7359

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ANTHONY MCCLAIN, a/k/a Ice, a/k/a New York,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-179, CA-98-3399-5-6)

    Submitted:

    February 10, 2000

    Decided:

    February 15, 2000

    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Anthony McClain, Appellant Pro Se. Scarlett Anne Wilson, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony McClain seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. McClain, Nos. CR-96-179; CA-98-

    3399-5-6 (D.S.C. July 22, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like