Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7198

CHARLIE EDWARD MCCLINTON,


Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHRIS HARRIS, of Probation, Pardon & Parole
Services; MITCH TUCKER, of Probation, Pardon &
Parole Services,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JOHN EWING, JR., of the Richland County
Sheriffs Department; ELLIS PEARSON, of the
Richland County Sheriffs Department; H. J.
POOLES, of the Richland County Sheriffs
Department; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ERIN
GADDY; DANITA WALLACE; REGINALD I. LLOYD,
Richland County Circuit Court Judge,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (6:05-cv-02999-PMD)

Submitted: November 15, 2006

Decided:

November 22, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Edward McClinton, Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Evans, Jr., SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:
Charlie Edward McClinton appeals the district courts
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

McClinton v.

Ewing, No. 6:05-cv-02999-PMD (D.S.C. June 12, 2006).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

You might also like