Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lendro Thomas, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Lendro Michael Thomas' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. A three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7679

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Lendro Michael Thomas' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. A three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Lendro Thomas, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Lendro Michael Thomas' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. A three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7679

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LENDRO MICHAEL THOMAS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (1:03-cr-00189-JFM-1)

    Submitted:

    April 26, 2012

    Decided:

    April 30, 2012

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lendro Michael Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell,


    Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lendro

    Michael

    Thomas

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying Thomas Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion to correct


    his

    sentence,

    which

    was

    imposed

    in

    May

    of

    2005.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we affirm.

    and

    materials

    have

    Accordingly,

    United States v. Thomas, No. 1:03-cr-00189-JFM-1 (D.

    Md. Nov. 30, 2011).


    facts

    We

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like