Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    United States v. Jerry Jenkins, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jerry Lee Jenkins appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a show cause hearing and for transport. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its orders dated July 30, 2012 and August 29, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Jerry Jenkins, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Jerry Lee Jenkins appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a show cause hearing and for transport. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its orders dated July 30, 2012 and August 29, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-01-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jerry Lee Jenkins appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a show cause hearing and for transport. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its orders dated July 30, 2012 and August 29, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Jerry Jenkins, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jerry Lee Jenkins appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a show cause hearing and for transport. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its orders dated July 30, 2012 and August 29, 2012. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7548

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    JERRY LEE JENKINS, a/k/a Jason Shane Jenkins, a/k/a Shane
    Jenkins,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (3:98-cr-00013-JDP-1)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2013

    Decided:

    January 22, 2013

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jerry Lee Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry Lee Jenkins appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for a show cause hearing and for transport.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Jenkins,

    No.

    3:98-cr-00013-JDP-1

    (N.D.W. Va. July 30, 2012; Aug. 29, 2012).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like