Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Watkins v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Michael Watkins' appeal of a district court decision denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its April 14, 1999 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Watkins v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Michael Watkins' appeal of a district court decision denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its April 14, 1999 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6610

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Michael Watkins' appeal of a district court decision denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its April 14, 1999 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Watkins v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Michael Watkins' appeal of a district court decision denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its April 14, 1999 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6610

    MICHAEL T. WATKINS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-651-3)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 1999

    Decided:

    July 27, 1999

    Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael T. Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Watkins seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See Watkins v. Commonwealth of

    Virginia, No. CA-98-651-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 1999).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like