Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2285

GIEDAY BAHILU,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


Appeals. (A75-363-095)

Submitted:

May 28, 2004

Decided:

June 25, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur


Washington, D.C., for
Attorney General, Linda
D. Williams, OFFICE OF
for Respondent.

D. Wright, III, THE WRIGHT LAW NETWORK,


Petitioner.
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant
S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, John
IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C.,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Gieday

Bahilu,

native

and

citizen

of

Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration


Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider its previous
order denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings.

We

have reviewed the record and the Boards order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Bahilus motion to
reconsider.

See

standard of review).

C.F.R.

1003.2(a)

(2003)

(setting

forth

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

on the reasoning of the Board.


(B.I.A. Sept. 26, 2003).

See In re: Bahilu, No. A75-363-095

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


materials

before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

You might also like