Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    William Terrence Cross appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 to reduce his sentence and reverse his conviction for lack of jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6671

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Terrence Cross appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 to reduce his sentence and reverse his conviction for lack of jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Terrence Cross appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 to reduce his sentence and reverse his conviction for lack of jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6671

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2008

    Decided:

    August 26, 2008

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William Terrence Cross appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C.A. 3582(c) (West Supp. 2008) and Fed. R.
    Crim. P. 36 motion and denying his motion to reverse his conviction
    for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v. Cross,

    No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2008; Apr. 9, 2008). We


    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like