Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    In Re: Puzey V., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order denying Michael Puzey's petition for a writ of mandamus. The order summarizes that Puzey had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his Rule 60 motion. However, the court notes that the magistrate judge recently issued a report recommending denial of the motion and notifying Puzey of his right to file objections. As the district court has now acted on the case, the mandamus petition seeking an order to act is deemed moot and denied. Puzey's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Puzey V., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a court order denying Michael Puzey's petition for a writ of mandamus. The order summarizes that Puzey had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his Rule 60 motion. However, the court notes that the magistrate judge recently issued a report recommending denial of the motion and notifying Puzey of his right to file objections. As the district court has now acted on the case, the mandamus petition seeking an order to act is deemed moot and denied. Puzey's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1292

    Original Title

    In Re: Puzey v., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order denying Michael Puzey's petition for a writ of mandamus. The order summarizes that Puzey had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his Rule 60 motion. However, the court notes that the magistrate judge recently issued a report recommending denial of the motion and notifying Puzey of his right to file objections. As the district court has now acted on the case, the mandamus petition seeking an order to act is deemed moot and denied. Puzey's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    In Re: Puzey V., 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order denying Michael Puzey's petition for a writ of mandamus. The order summarizes that Puzey had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his Rule 60 motion. However, the court notes that the magistrate judge recently issued a report recommending denial of the motion and notifying Puzey of his right to file objections. As the district court has now acted on the case, the mandamus petition seeking an order to act is deemed moot and denied. Puzey's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1292

    In Re:

    MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (3:00-cr-00057-JPB-JES-16)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2009

    Decided:

    July 27, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Paul Puzey, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Paul Puzey petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
    his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion.

    He seeks an order from this

    court directing the district court to act.

    Our review of the

    docket sheet reveals that on July 2, 2009, the magistrate judge


    issued

    report

    and

    recommendation

    that

    Puzeys

    motion

    be

    denied, and notified Puzey of his right to file objections.


    Because

    the

    district

    court

    has

    recently

    Puzeys case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.


    leave

    to

    proceed

    in

    forma

    pauperis.

    We

    dispense

    acted

    on

    We grant
    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like