Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Kenyatta Robinson's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7244

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Kenyatta Robinson's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Kenyatta Robinson's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7244

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KENYATTA ROBINSON,
    a/k/a Kevin Clark,

    a/k/a

    Kavon

    Henderson,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-47-2)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 1999

    Decided:

    August 5, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kenyatta Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    See United States v. Robinson, No. CR-94-17; CA-97-47-2

    (E.D. Va. July 23, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like