Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Nance, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Jimmy Lawrence Nance appealed the district court's denial of his motions to reduce his restitution and find/retest DNA evidence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning in denying the motions as outlined in its September 2001 opinion. The facts and legal arguments were deemed adequately presented without requiring oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7639

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jimmy Lawrence Nance appealed the district court's denial of his motions to reduce his restitution and find/retest DNA evidence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning in denying the motions as outlined in its September 2001 opinion. The facts and legal arguments were deemed adequately presented without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Nance, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jimmy Lawrence Nance appealed the district court's denial of his motions to reduce his restitution and find/retest DNA evidence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's reasoning in denying the motions as outlined in its September 2001 opinion. The facts and legal arguments were deemed adequately presented without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7639

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CR-92-135)

    Submitted:

    January 31, 2002

    Decided:

    February 8, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jimmy Lawrence Nance appeals from the district courts order
    denying his motions for reduction of restitution and for finding
    and retesting of DNA evidence.

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    AccordUnited

    States v. Nance, No. CR-92-135 (W.D. Va. filed Sept. 6, 2001 &
    entered Sept. 10, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like