Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Black v. Beeler, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Michael Black, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief, and Black appealed. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-10-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7129

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Black, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief, and Black appealed. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Black v. Beeler, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Black, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief, and Black appealed. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7129

    MICHAEL BLACK,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden-FMC, Butner, NC,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-03-195-5-HO)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 2003

    Decided:

    October 8, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Black, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant


    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Black,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.


    2241 (2000).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Black v. Beeler, No. CA-03-195-5-HO (E.D.N.C.

    July 7, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like