Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Martin Hughes, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    22 views2 pages
    Martin Avery Hughes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduced sentence. An unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials submitted. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hughes' motion for a reduced sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6171

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Martin Avery Hughes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduced sentence. An unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials submitted. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hughes' motion for a reduced sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    22 views2 pages

    United States v. Martin Hughes, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Martin Avery Hughes appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduced sentence. An unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials submitted. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hughes' motion for a reduced sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6171

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MARTIN AVERY HUGHES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    James P. Jones, District
    Judge. (1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-35)

    Submitted:

    March 26, 2013

    Decided:

    March 29, 2013

    Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Martin Avery Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Martin Avery Hughes appeals the district courts order
    denying

    relief

    on

    his

    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Hughes,

    No.

    1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-35 (W.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2013).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like