Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Carter v. Lanham, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James T. Carter under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland Department of Correction officials and medical providers. The district court denied Carter relief and Carter appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its opinions and orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Carter v. Lanham, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James T. Carter under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland Department of Correction officials and medical providers. The district court denied Carter relief and Carter appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its opinions and orders.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7648

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James T. Carter under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland Department of Correction officials and medical providers. The district court denied Carter relief and Carter appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its opinions and orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Carter v. Lanham, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James T. Carter under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland Department of Correction officials and medical providers. The district court denied Carter relief and Carter appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its opinions and orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7648

    JAMES T. CARTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Former Commissioner of
    Correction, Division of Correction; THOMAS R.
    CORCORAN, Former Warden of Maryland House of
    Correction-Annex, Division of Correction;
    JAMES MURPHY, Chief of Security, Maryland
    House of Correction-Annex; G. J. DUCKETT,
    CCMSII, Institutional Transfer Coordinator,
    Maryland House of Correction; PAM SORENSON,
    Case Management Supervisor, Maryland House of
    Correction-Annex; MAJOR TUTHILL, Maryland
    House of Correction-Annex; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HYLANDER, Maryland House of CorrectionAnnex; TYRONE CROWDER, Maryland House of
    Correction-Annex;
    CORRECTIONAL
    MEDICAL
    SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Maryland House of
    Correction-Annex; HOWARD COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED; ROBERT B. TESTANI, DDS;
    DOCTOR GROJEC, Medical Department (CMS),
    Maryland House of Correction-Annex; DOCTOR
    YONAS, Medical Department (CMS), Maryland
    House of Correction-Annex, in their personal
    and official capacities for their actions
    under color of state law,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-992543-L)

    Submitted:

    March 22, 2001

    Decided:

    March 29, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James T. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Angela Michelle Eaves, Assistant Attorney General,
    Baltimore, Maryland; Michael Evan Blumenfeld, KRAMON & GRAHAM,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James T. Carter appeals the district courts orders denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinions and
    orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Lanham, No. CA-99-2543L (D. Md. filed Oct. 13, 2000; entered Oct. 16, 2000; filed Feb. 8,
    2000; entered Feb. 9, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument be-

    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED
    2

    You might also like