Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Charmaine Anderson v. Gregory Jacko, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Charmaine Anderson's employment discrimination complaint against the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commissioner. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for reconsideration and motion to alter or amend judgment. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Additionally, the Court of Appeals determined that Anderson waived certain claims by failing to raise them in her informal brief and waived other claims by raising them for the first time on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Charmaine Anderson v. Gregory Jacko, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Charmaine Anderson's employment discrimination complaint against the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commissioner. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for reconsideration and motion to alter or amend judgment. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Additionally, the Court of Appeals determined that Anderson waived certain claims by failing to raise them in her informal brief and waived other claims by raising them for the first time on appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1340

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Charmaine Anderson's employment discrimination complaint against the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commissioner. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for reconsideration and motion to alter or amend judgment. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Additionally, the Court of Appeals determined that Anderson waived certain claims by failing to raise them in her informal brief and waived other claims by raising them for the first time on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Charmaine Anderson v. Gregory Jacko, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Charmaine Anderson's employment discrimination complaint against the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commissioner. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for reconsideration and motion to alter or amend judgment. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Additionally, the Court of Appeals determined that Anderson waived certain claims by failing to raise them in her informal brief and waived other claims by raising them for the first time on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1340

    CHARMAINE L. ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    GREGORY
    JACKO,
    Commission,

    Commissioner,

    U.S.

    Nuclear

    Regulatory

    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (8:11-cv-01370-JFM)

    Submitted:

    July 19, 2013

    Decided:

    August 6, 2013

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charmaine L. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charmaine
    courts

    orders

    complaint,

    L.

    Anderson

    dismissing

    denying

    her

    appeals

    her

    Fed.

    from

    employment

    R.

    Civ.

    P.

    the

    district

    discrimination
    59

    motion

    for

    reconsideration, and denying her subsequent motion to alter or


    amend

    judgment.

    We

    reversible error.

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Anderson v. Jacko, No.

    8-11-cv-01370-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 11, 2013).

    In addition, we note

    that Anderson has waived certain claims by failing to raise them


    in her informal brief, see Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr.,
    Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009), and has waived other
    claims

    by

    raising

    them

    for

    the

    first

    time

    on

    appeal.

    Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    See
    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like