Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief without prejudice on Sebastian X. Moore's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Moore's motions alleging bias and requesting judgment on the pleadings were also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief without prejudice on Sebastian X. Moore's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Moore's motions alleging bias and requesting judgment on the pleadings were also denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6072

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief without prejudice on Sebastian X. Moore's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Moore's motions alleging bias and requesting judgment on the pleadings were also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief without prejudice on Sebastian X. Moore's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Theodis Beck and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Moore's motions alleging bias and requesting judgment on the pleadings were also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6072

    SEBASTIAN X. MOORE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THEODIS BECK,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03017-FL)

    Submitted:

    July 28, 2011

    Decided:

    August 1, 2011

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    Raleigh,
    Appellee.

    Elizabeth F. Parsons,
    North
    Carolina,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Sebastian X. Moore appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006)
    complaint.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Moore v. Beck, No. 5:08-ct-03017-FL (E.D.N.C.

    Sept. 22 & Dec. 9, 2010).

    Moores Bias Motion and motion for

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) Judgment on the Pleadings are denied.


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like