Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Restoney Robinson filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views2 pages
    Restoney Robinson filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that oral argument was not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 99 F.3d 1131 Docket: 96-6914

    Original Title

    Restoney Robinson v. North Carolina Attorney General Tommy Lee Tinsley Walter Johnson Paul B. Calhoun Howard L. Wooten W. Perry McNair R.G. Wauler Carrie A. Mock Parry H. Leary, 99 F.3d 1131, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Restoney Robinson filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    23 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Restoney Robinson filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented such that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    99 F.

    3d 1131

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Restoney ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; Tommy Lee
    Tinsley; Walter
    Johnson; Paul B. Calhoun; Howard L. Wooten; W.
    Perry McNair; R.G. Wauler; Carrie A.
    Mock; Parry H. Leary,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 96-6914.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
    Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

    Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,


    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition
    filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective
    Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

    the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Attorney General of North


    Carolina, No. CA-96-1 (M.D.N.C. May 14, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like