Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Miller v. Godwin, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Gary L. Miller appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record. An unpublished per curiam opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The appeals court thus affirmed the dismissal of Miller's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7581

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Gary L. Miller appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record. An unpublished per curiam opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The appeals court thus affirmed the dismissal of Miller's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Miller v. Godwin, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Gary L. Miller appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record. An unpublished per curiam opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The appeals court thus affirmed the dismissal of Miller's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7581

    GARY L. MILLER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    C. GODWIN, C/O; SERGEANT MCKOY; MS. WASHINGTON, Nurse,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03153-FL)

    Submitted:

    January 18, 2011

    Decided:

    January 28, 2011

    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gary L. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gary

    L.

    Miller

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to


    state

    claim.

    We

    reversible error.

    have

    Oct.

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    (E.D.N.C.

    reviewed

    13,

    Miller v. Godwin, No. 5:09-ct-03153-FL

    2010).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like