Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Byrd v. Salisbury Police Dep, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Curtis Byrd appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Salisbury Police Department and two officers. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and materials before it and determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-02-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7431

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Curtis Byrd appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Salisbury Police Department and two officers. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and materials before it and determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Byrd v. Salisbury Police Dep, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Curtis Byrd appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Salisbury Police Department and two officers. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and materials before it and determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7431

    CURTIS BYRD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SALISBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT; TOM
    Officer; RUSTY SAVAGE, Officer,

    GRIFFIN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-03-1939-L)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2004

    Decided:

    February 12, 2004

    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis Byrd appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000)
    complaint.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Byrd v. Salisbury Police Dept, No. CA-03-

    1939-L (D. Md. Sept. 4, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like