Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gary Sayre appealed a district court's ruling in favor of his former employer, FMRS Mental Health Council, in an employment discrimination case. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. As unpublished opinions are not binding, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Sayre did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims of employment discrimination against FMRS Mental Health Council.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Gary Sayre appealed a district court's ruling in favor of his former employer, FMRS Mental Health Council, in an employment discrimination case. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. As unpublished opinions are not binding, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Sayre did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims of employment discrimination against FMRS Mental Health Council.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-02-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1891

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gary Sayre appealed a district court's ruling in favor of his former employer, FMRS Mental Health Council, in an employment discrimination case. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. As unpublished opinions are not binding, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Sayre did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims of employment discrimination against FMRS Mental Health Council.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gary Sayre appealed a district court's ruling in favor of his former employer, FMRS Mental Health Council, in an employment discrimination case. The appeals court reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. As unpublished opinions are not binding, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Sayre did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims of employment discrimination against FMRS Mental Health Council.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1891

    GARY W. SAYRE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FMRS MENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
    Joseph Robert Goodwin,
    District Judge. (5:04-cv-00333)

    Submitted: February 22, 2007

    Decided:

    February 27, 2007

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gary W. Sayre, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Dale Morrison, SCHUMACHER,


    FRANCIS & NELSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM.
    Gary

    W.

    Sayre

    appeals

    the

    district

    court's

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief in his civil action alleging employment discrimination.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. See Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council, Inc., No. 5:04-cv00333 (S.D.W. Va. July 10, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like