Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Bast v. Cox, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Richard L. Bast's bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The court affirmed the district court's disposition that Bast's appeal of the bankruptcy court's September 2, 1997 order of non-dischargeability was not filed in a timely manner. The court also found that Bast waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to alter or amend the bankruptcy court's judgment by failing to raise any issues related to that motion in his informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Bast v. Cox, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Richard L. Bast's bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The court affirmed the district court's disposition that Bast's appeal of the bankruptcy court's September 2, 1997 order of non-dischargeability was not filed in a timely manner. The court also found that Bast waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to alter or amend the bankruptcy court's judgment by failing to raise any issues related to that motion in his informal brief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Richard L. Bast's bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The court affirmed the district court's disposition that Bast's appeal of the bankruptcy court's September 2, 1997 order of non-dischargeability was not filed in a timely manner. The court also found that Bast waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to alter or amend the bankruptcy court's judgment by failing to raise any issues related to that motion in his informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views3 pages

    Bast v. Cox, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Richard L. Bast's bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The court affirmed the district court's disposition that Bast's appeal of the bankruptcy court's September 2, 1997 order of non-dischargeability was not filed in a timely manner. The court also found that Bast waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to alter or amend the bankruptcy court's judgment by failing to raise any issues related to that motion in his informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1863

    In Re:

    RICHARD L. BAST,
    Debtor.

    _________________________
    RICHARD L. BAST,
    Debtor - Appellant,
    versus
    ROGER A. COX; COHEN, GETTINGS, DUNHAM & DAVIS,
    PC; COHEN, DUNN & CURCIO, PC; CLAUDE DAVID
    CONVISSER; VICTOR MICHAEL GLASBERG; JORDAN,
    COYNE & SAVITS; CHARLES WARREN KRAMER; JODY L.
    NEWMAN; BARBARA O. REEVES; DAVID B. SMITH;
    VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
    Party in Interest.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-3988-PJM, BK-96-10118-DK, AP-97-1023-DK)

    Submitted:

    March 30, 1999

    Decided:

    April 23, 1999

    Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Richard L. Bast, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Willard Dunham, Jr., Joel
    L. Dahnke, COHEN, GETTINGS & DUNHAM, Arlington, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard L. Bast appeals the district courts orders dismissing
    his bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denying his motion for reconsideration of the same.

    We affirm.

    To the extent that Bast seeks to appeal the district courts


    disposition of the bankruptcy courts September 2, 1997, order of
    non-dischargeability, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    See Bast v. Cox, No. CA-97-3988-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 27, 1998).

    To the extent that he seeks to appeal the denial of his motion to


    alter or amend judgment filed in the bankruptcy court, we find that
    Bast has waived all issues attendant to this motion by failing to
    raise them in his informal brief.

    See Local Rule 34(b).

    Accord-

    ingly, we affirm the district courts decision and deny Basts


    motion for appointment of counsel.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like