Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    William Scarborough v. Sebastian Valenti (Warden), 801 F.2d 394, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scarborough's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    William Scarborough v. Sebastian Valenti (Warden), 801 F.2d 394, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scarborough's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-09-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 801 F.2d 394 Docket: 86-7077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scarborough's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    William Scarborough v. Sebastian Valenti (Warden), 801 F.2d 394, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed William Scarborough's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found that the issues had been authoritatively decided recently and that an appeal would be without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    801 F.

    2d 394
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William SCARBOROUGH, Appellant,
    v.
    Sebastian VALENTI (Warden), Appellee.
    No. 86-7077.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 19, 1986.
    Decided Sept. 16, 1986.

    William Scarborough, appellant pro se.


    Stephen H. Sachs, Attorney General's Office, and Jillyn K. Schulze,
    Attorney General's Office, for appellee.
    D.Md.
    DISMISSED.
    Before HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Scarborough v. Valenti, C/A No. Y-84-4387 (D.Md., Jan. 30,

    1986).
    DISMISSED

    You might also like