Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tapia-Santana, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion to remit payment of his criminal fine. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 22, 1999 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6943

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion to remit payment of his criminal fine. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 22, 1999 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Tapia-Santana, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion to remit payment of his criminal fine. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 22, 1999 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6943

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LAZARO TAPIA-SANTANA, a/k/a Lazaro Tapia Martinez,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-62-3)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 1999

    Decided:

    October 26, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lazaro Tapia-Santana, Appellant Pro Se.
    Fenita Morris Shepard,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remit payment of his criminal fine.

    We have re-

    viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See United States v. Tapia-Santana, No. CR-93-62-3


    (E.D.N.C. June 22, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like