Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Arbogast v. Cheeks, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Roger Lee Arbogast filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against James A. Cheeks, which the district court denied. Arbogast appealed the denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning for denying Arbogast's complaint. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-02-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7425

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Roger Lee Arbogast filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against James A. Cheeks, which the district court denied. Arbogast appealed the denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning for denying Arbogast's complaint. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Arbogast v. Cheeks, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Roger Lee Arbogast filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against James A. Cheeks, which the district court denied. Arbogast appealed the denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning for denying Arbogast's complaint. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7425

    ROGER LEE ARBOGAST,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES A. CHEEKS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
    (CA-03-2221-9-24)

    Submitted: January 29, 2004

    Decided:

    February 6, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Roger Lee Arbogast, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Roger Lee Arbogast appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See Arbogast v. Cheeks, No.

    CA-03-2221-9-24 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2003).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like