Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sullivan v. Allen, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. David Farrell Sullivan appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil rights complaint against Clay T. Allen. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided. The unpublished opinion from the appeals court is not binding legal precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6694

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. David Farrell Sullivan appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil rights complaint against Clay T. Allen. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided. The unpublished opinion from the appeals court is not binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Sullivan v. Allen, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. David Farrell Sullivan appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his civil rights complaint against Clay T. Allen. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided. The unpublished opinion from the appeals court is not binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6694

    DAVID FARRELL SULLIVAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CLAY T. ALLEN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (CA-03-3841-7-26)

    Submitted:

    June 24, 2004

    Decided:

    July 2, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Farrell Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David Farrell Sullivan appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985 (2000).
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Sullivan v. Allen, No. CA-03-3841-7-26 (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2004).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like