Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cruz v. Doe, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Marco Antonio Cruz filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical and corrections officials which was dismissed by the district court. Cruz appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the decision and reasoning of the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7304

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Marco Antonio Cruz filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical and corrections officials which was dismissed by the district court. Cruz appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the decision and reasoning of the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Cruz v. Doe, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Marco Antonio Cruz filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical and corrections officials which was dismissed by the district court. Cruz appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the decision and reasoning of the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7304

    MARCO ANTONIO CRUZ,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN DOE, Medical Director; NURSE PRESTON; JIM PENDERGRAPH,
    Sheriff, sued in individual and official capacities,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
    District Judge. (3:07-cv-327-03-MU)

    Submitted:

    February 21, 2008

    Decided:

    February 26, 2008

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marco Antonio Cruz, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Marco Antonio Cruz appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    3:07-cv-327-03-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2007).

    See Cruz v. Doe, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like