Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Woods v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Charles Robin Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-11-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7797

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Robin Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Woods v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Robin Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7797

    CHARLES ROBIN WOODS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; LOUIS RUZICKA,
    Captain; LENNARD JOHNSON, Lieutenant; DELANVIEL EVANS, Sergeant; BRUCE WASHINGTON, Sergeant; EDWARD TAMES, Sergeant; BRIAN JOHNSON,
    Sergeant; CURTIS L. MCMILLION, Officer; R.
    JOHNSON, Officer; ANDRE BROWN, Officer; OFFICER WILLIAMS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-336-CCB)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 1998

    Decided:

    November 3, 1998

    Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Robin Woods, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
    General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Robin Woods appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Woods v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-336-CCB (D. Md. Nov.
    26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like