Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Sherwin v. US Dept Air Force, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Charles Sherwin's Rule 60(b)(6) motion and motion to correct the docket. The appeals court reviewed the record and found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions because the matters Sherwin sought to challenge became final in 1995, and there is no basis to reopen the case years later. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Sherwin v. US Dept Air Force, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Charles Sherwin's Rule 60(b)(6) motion and motion to correct the docket. The appeals court reviewed the record and found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions because the matters Sherwin sought to challenge became final in 1995, and there is no basis to reopen the case years later. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1589

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Charles Sherwin's Rule 60(b)(6) motion and motion to correct the docket. The appeals court reviewed the record and found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions because the matters Sherwin sought to challenge became final in 1995, and there is no basis to reopen the case years later. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    16 views2 pages

    Sherwin v. US Dept Air Force, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Charles Sherwin's Rule 60(b)(6) motion and motion to correct the docket. The appeals court reviewed the record and found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions because the matters Sherwin sought to challenge became final in 1995, and there is no basis to reopen the case years later. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1589

    CHARLES T. SHERWIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    RONALD G. SPROVERO; RONALD L. BILLMYER; R.S.
    BURRUS; A.D. TALLEY; B. R. HENDERSON; CELIA
    SMITH; LAVERNE HARPER; M. R. PETERS; ROBERT
    CUTRELL; ROBERT STROEBEL; DONALD ROBINSON;
    JEFF OSBORNE; BRAD ADAMS; WILLIAM WALLER,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-90-34-3-BR)

    Submitted:

    September 5, 2002

    Decided:

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    September 10, 2002

    Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles T. Sherwin appeals the district courts orders denying
    his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion and motion for correction of
    the docket.

    We have reviewed the record and find the district

    court did not abuse its discretion because the matters Sherwin
    seeks to challenge became final in 1995, and there is no basis for
    reopening the case at this late date.

    Accordingly, we affirm.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like