Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hardy, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Howard Hardy appealed the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea from a 1995 criminal case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that the motion was untimely. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6928

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Howard Hardy appealed the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea from a 1995 criminal case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that the motion was untimely. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Hardy, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Howard Hardy appealed the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea from a 1995 criminal case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that the motion was untimely. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6928

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    HOWARD HARDY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (1:95-cr-00156)

    Submitted: August 24, 2006

    Decided: August 31, 2006

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Howard Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Howard Hardy appeals the district courts order denying
    as untimely his motion to withdraw his guilty plea in a 1995
    criminal case.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Hardy, Case No. 1:95-cr-00156

    (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like